Famous land Mark court cases shortline data.

Curtis Brown Mapp v. Ohio (1961) The Fourth Amendment states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause . . . and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Mapp was suspected of committing a high class crime. Police came into home without search warrant and …

…whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way, unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination The decision in Escobedo v. Illinois, , stressed the need for protective devices to make the process of police interrogation conform to the dictates of the privilege.