Cassius would have been a far better leader in the conspirac

In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirator’s movement to assassinate Caesar and to establish a new order where everyone is supposedly a freeman is headed by character Brutus. It is considered by many, that Cassius, Brutus' partner, but subsidiary in the movement would have served as a better leader. I completely agree with this assertion. In the play, Brutus is portrayed as being much too noble to effectively lead a conspiracy. …

…that Brutus would be plagued by his guilt later on in the play. Brutus' another weakness is his remorseful nature, this happens to be another characteristic that disqualifies him as a candidate for the ideal leader of a conspiracy. Cassius, unlike Brutus, is relentless and entirely selfish. He has always been practical and achievement oriented. He seems to be the perfect example of a revolt or conspiracy leader and certainly a better one than Brutus. .